AMPL: A Modeling Language for Mathematical Programming

MINOS Directives for AMPL

To set these directives, assign a string specifying their values to the AMPL option minos_options. For example:
     ampl: option minos_options 'crash_option=0 scale=no';

     MINOS is an optimization package for linear and nonlinear
mathematical programs in continuous variables.  This supplement
to AMPL: A Modeling Language for Mathematical Programming
describes the most important features of MINOS for AMPL users.  A
complete User's Guide for MINOS, detailing all options and giving
technical references for the algorithms, is available from the
Systems Optimization Laboratory, Department of Operations
Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4022.

     Section II.1 below describes the kinds of problems to which
MINOS is applicable, and Section II.2 explains in general terms
how solver-specific directives can be passed from AMPL to MINOS.
Sections II.3 and II.4 then briefly introduce the algorithms that
MINOS uses for linear and for nonlinear programming, respec-
tively, and describe the relevant algorithmic directives.  Sec-
tion II.5 presents directives for controlling listings from
MINOS, and Section II.6 discusses options for restarting from a
known solution or basis.

II.1  Applicability

     MINOS is designed to solve the linear programs described in
Chapters 1-8 and 11-12 of AMPL: A Modeling Language for Mathemat-
ical Programming, as well as the ``smooth'' nonlinear programs
described in Chapter 13.  Smooth nonlinear functions can be
accommodated in both the objective and the constraints; nonlinear
equation systems may also be solved by omitting an objective.
Nonsmooth nonlinearities are also accepted, but MINOS is not
designed for them and in general will not produce reliable
results when they are present.

     MINOS does not solve integer programs as described in Chap-
ter 15.  When presented with an integer program, MINOS ignores
the integrality restrictions on the variables, as indicated by a
message such as

     MINOS 5.4: ignoring integrality of 5 variables

It then solves the continuous relaxation of the resulting prob-
lem, and returns a solution in which some of the integer vari-
ables may have fractional values.

     MINOS can solve piecewise-linear programs, as described in
Chapter 14, provided that they satisfy certain rules that permit
them to be transformed to linear programs.  Any piecewise-linear
term in a minimized objective must be convex, its slopes forming
an increasing sequence as in:

     <<-1,1,3,5; -5,-1,0,1.5,3>> x[j]

Any piecewise-linear term in a maximized objective must be con-
cave, its slopes forming a decreasing sequence as in:

     <<1,3; 1.5,0.5,0.25>> x[j]

In the constraints, any piecewise-linear term must be either con-
vex and on the left-hand side of a < constraint (or equivalently,
the right-hand side of a > constraint), or else concave and on
the left-hand side of a > constraint (or equivalently, the
right-hand side of a < constraint).  AMPL automatically converts
the piecewise-linear program to a linear one, sends the latter to
MINOS, and converts the solution back; the conversion has the
effect of adding a variable to correspond to each linear piece.
Piecewise-linear programs that violate the above rules are con-
verted to integer programs, which are treated as described in the
preceding paragraph; MINOS returns a solution to the continuous
relaxation of the equivalent integer program, which in general is
not optimal for the original piecewise-linear problem.

II.2  Controlling MINOS from AMPL

     In many instances, you can successfully apply MINOS by sim-
ply specifying a model and data, setting the solver option to
minos, and typing solve.  For larger linear programs and more
difficult nonlinear programs, however, you may need to pass spe-
cific directives to MINOS to obtain the desired results.

     To give directives to MINOS, you must first assign an appro-
priate character string to the AMPL option called minos_options.
When solve invokes MINOS, it breaks this string into a series of
individual directives.  Here is an example:

     ampl: model diet.mod;
     ampl: data diet.dat;

     ampl: option solver minos;
     ampl: option minos_options 'crash_option=0 \
     ampl?    feasibility_tolerance=1.0e-8 scale=no \
     ampl?    iterations_limit=100';
     ampl: solve;
     MINOS 5.4:

     MINOS 5.4: optimal solution found.
     4 iterations, objective 88.2

MINOS confirms each directive; it will display an error message
if it encounters one that it does not recognize.

     All of the directives described below have the form of an
identifier, an = sign, and a value; unlike AMPL, MINOS treats
upper-case and lower-case letters as being the same.  You may
store any number of concatenated directives in minos_options.
The example above shows how to type all the directives in one
long string, using the \ character to indicate that the string
continues on the next line.  Alternatively, you can list several
strings, which AMPL will automatically concatenate:

     ampl: option minos_options 'crash_option=0'
     ampl?    ' feasibility_tolerance=1.0e-8 scale=no'
     ampl?    ' iterations_limit=100';

In this form, you must take care to supply the space that goes
between the directives; here we have put it before
feasibility_tolerance and iterations_limit.

     If you have specified the directives above, and then want to
set optimality_tolerance to 1.0e-8 and change crash_option to 1,
you might think to type:

     ampl: option minos_options
     ampl?    'optimality_tolerance=1.0e-8 crash_option=1';

This will replace the previous minos_options string, however; the
other previously specified directives such as
feasibility_tolerance and scale will revert to their default val-
ues.  (MINOS supplies a default value for every directive not
explicitly specified; defaults are indicated in the discussion
below.)  To append new directives to minos_options, use this

     ampl: option minos_options $minos_options
     ampl?    ' optimality_tolerance=1.0e-8 crash_option=1';

A $ in front of an option name denotes the current value of that
option, so this statement appends more directives to the current
directive string.  As a result the string contains two directives
for crash_option, but the new one overrides the earlier one.

II.3  Using MINOS for linear programming

     For linear programs, MINOS employs the primal simplex algo-
rithm described in many textbooks.  The algorithm maintains a
subset of basic variables (or, a basis) equal in size to the num-
ber of constraints.  A basic solution is obtained by solving for
the basic variables, when the remaining nonbasic variables are
fixed at appropriate bounds.  Each iteration of the algorithm
picks a new basic variable from among the nonbasic ones, steps to
a new basic solution, and drops some basic variable at a bound.

     The coefficients of the variables form a constraint matrix,
and the coefficients of the basic variables form a nonsingular
square submatrix called the basis matrix. At each iteration, the
simplex algorithm must solve certain linear systems involving the
basis matrix.  For this purpose MINOS maintains a factorization
of the basis matrix, which is updated at most iterations, and is
occasionally recomputed.

     The sparsity of a matrix is the proportion of its elements
that are not zero.  The constraint matrix, basis matrix and fac-
torization are said to be relatively sparse or dense according to
their proportion of nonzeros.  Most linear programs of practical
interest have many zeros in all the relevant matrices, and the
larger ones tend also to be the sparser.

     The amount of RAM memory required by MINOS grows with the
size of the linear program, which is a function of the numbers of
variables and constraints and the sparsity of the coefficient
matrix.  The factorization of the basis matrix also requires an
allocation of memory; the amount is problem-specific, depending
on the sparsity of the factorization.

     The following MINOS directives apply to the solution of lin-
ear programs.  The letters i and r denote integer and real val-
ues, respectively.  The symbol eps represents the ``machine pre-
cision'' - the smallest value such that 1+eps can be distin-
guished from 1; for many machines it is 2-52 ~~ 2.22x10E-16.

Crash_option=i                     (default 3)
Crash_tolerance=r                  (default 0.1)

     These directives govern the initial determination of the
basic variables, except when the basis is read from a file as
described in II.6 below.

     For i=0, the initial basis contains a slack or artificial
variable that MINOS automatically associates with each con-
straint; the basis matrix is an identity matrix.  For i>0, MINOS
uses a heuristic ``crash procedure'' to quickly choose a basis
matrix that has fewer artificial variables and is likely to be
nonsingular.  Since artificial variables are generally not
required in an optimal basis, this procedure tends to reduce the
number of iterations to optimality.

     When i=1 or 2 (which are equivalent for linear programs),
the crash procedure determines a full initial basis before the
first iteration.  When i=3, the crash procedure initially deter-
mines a basis for just the equality constraints, and simplex
iterations are performed until those constraints are satisfied
(or determined to be infeasible).  The crash procedure is then
called again to extend the basis to all constraints.

     In each column of the coefficient matrix, the crash proce-
dure looks only at coefficients whose magnitude is more than r
times the largest magnitude in the column.  Thus when r=0 it
looks at all coefficients; in such a case it finds a triangular
basis matrix that is guaranteed to be nonsingular.  As r is
increased the risk of singularity is also increased, but fewer
artificial variables may be included.  The default value of r=0.1
generally works well, but the best value is highly dependent on
problem structure and can be determined only through experimenta-

Expand_frequency=i                 (default 10000)

     To discourage long series of degenerate iterations, at which
no reduction in the objective is achieved, MINOS employs a proce-
dure that lets nonbasic variables move beyond their bounds by a
certain tolerance.  If feasibility_tolerance (see below) is r,
then the tolerance increases from r/2 to r (in steps of 0.5r/i)
in the course of i iterations, after which it is reset and the
procedure begins anew.  The default setting should be adequate
for problems of moderate size.

Factorization_frequency=i          (default 100)

     The factorization of the basis matrix is updated at most i
times before it is recomputed directly.  (An update occurs at the
end of most iterations, though for some it can be skipped.)
Higher values of i may be more efficient for dense problems in
which the factorization has two or more times as many nonzeros as
the basis matrix, while lower values may be more efficient for
very sparse problems.  Lower values also require less memory for
storing the updates.

Feasibility_tolerance=r            (default 1.0e-6)

     A variable or linear constraint is considered to be feasible
if it does not lie outside its bounds by more than r.  If MINOS
determines that the sum of all infeasibilities cannot be reduced
to zero, it reports ``no feasible solution'' and returns the last
solution that it found.  The sum of infeasibilities in the
reported solution is not necessarily the minimum possible; how-
ever, if all the infeasibilities are quite small, it may be
appropriate to raise r by a factor of 10 or 100.

Iterations_limit=i                 (default 99999999)

     MINOS stops after i iterations, even if it has not yet iden-
tified an optimal solution.

LU_factor_tolerance=r1             (default 100.0)
LU_update_tolerance=r2             (default 10.0)

     The values of r1 and r2 affect the stability and sparsity of
the basis factorization during refactorization and updating,
respectively.  Smaller values >1 favor stability, while larger
values favor sparsity; the defaults usually strike a good compro-

LU_singularity_tolerance=r         (default eps2/3~~10E-11)

     When factoring the basis matrix, MINOS employs r in a test
for singularity; any column where singularity is detected is
arbitrarily replaced by a slack or artificial column.  If the
basis becomes nearly singular as the optimum is approached, a
larger value of r<1 may give better performance.

Optimality_tolerance=r             (default 1.0e-6)

     The value of r determines the exactness of MINOS's test for
optimality.  (In technical terms, at an optimum the dual vari-
ables and constraints may not violate their bounds by more than r
times a measure of the size of the dual solution.)  The default
setting is usually adequate.  A smaller value of r>0 may yield a
better objective function value, at the cost of more iterations.

Partial_price=i                    (default 10)

     MINOS incorporates a heuristic procedure to search through
the nonbasic variables for a good candidate to enter the basis.
(In technical terms, MINOS searches for a nonbasic variable that
has a sufficiently large reduced cost, where ``sufficiently
large'' is determined by a dynamic tolerance.)  To save computa-
tional expense, only about 1/i times the number of variables are
searched at an iteration, unless more must be searched to find
one good candidate.

     As i is increased, iterations tend to take less time, but
the simplex algorithm tends to require more iterations; changes
in i often have a significant effect on total solution time.  The
ideal value of i is highly problem-specific, however, and must be
determined by experimentation.  For linear programs that have
many more variables than constraints, a larger i is usually pre-
ferred.  A setting of i=1, which causes all nonbasic variables to
be searched at each iteration, can be the best choice when the
number of variables is small relative to the number of con-

Pivot_tolerance=r                  (default eps2/3~~10E-11)

     MINOS rejects a nonbasic variable chosen to enter the basis
if the resulting basis matrix would be almost singular, according
to a test in which the value of r is employed.  A larger value of
r strengthens the test, promoting stability but possibly increas-
ing the number of rejections.


Scale_option=i                     (default 2)
Scale_tolerance=r                  (default 0.9)

     MINOS incorporates a heuristic procedure that scales the
constraint matrix in a way that usually brings the elements
closer to 1.0, and reduces the ratio between the largest and
smallest element.  Scaling merely converts the given linear pro-
gram to an equivalent one, but it can affect the performance of
the basis factorization routines, and the choices of nonbasic
variables to enter the basis.  In some but not all cases, the
simplex method solves a scaled problem more efficiently than its
unscaled counterpart.

     For i=0 no scaling is performed, while for i=1 or i=2 a
series of alternating row and column scalings is carried out.
For i=2 a certain additional scaling is performed that may be
helpful if the right-hand side (constant terms of the con-
straints) or solution contain large values; it takes into account
columns that are fixed or have positive lower bounds or negative
upper bounds.  Scale=yes is the same as the default, while
scale=no sets i=0.

     If i>0, the value of r affects the number of alternate row
and column scalings.  Raising r to 0.99 (say) may increase the
number of scalings and improve the final scaling slightly.

Weight_on_linear_objective=r       (default 0.0)

     When r=0, MINOS carries out the simplex algorithm in two
phases.  Phase 1 minimizes the ``sum of infeasibilities'', which
has to be zero in any feasible solution; then phase 2 minimizes
or maximizes the ``true objective'' supplied by the linear pro-

     When r>0, MINOS instead minimizes the objective defined by

	s r (true objective) + (sum of infeasibilities)

where s is +1 for a minimization problem or -1 for a maximiza-
tion.  If a feasible minimum is found, then it is also optimal to
the original linear program.  Otherwise r is reduced by a factor
of 10, and another pass is begun; r is set to zero after the
fifth reduction, or whenever a feasible solution is encountered.

     The effect of this directive is problem-dependent, and must
be determined by experimentation.  A good ``intermediate'' value
of r may yield an optimal solution in fewer iterations than the
two-phase approach.

II.4  Using MINOS for nonlinear programming

     For mathematical programs that are nonlinear in the objec-
tive but linear in the constraints, MINOS employs a reduced gra-
dient approach, which can be viewed as a generalization of the
simplex algorithm.  In addition to the basic variables, the algo-
rithm maintains a subset of superbasic variables that also may
vary between their bounds.  An iteration attempts to reduce the
objective within the subspace of basic and superbasic variables,
employing a quasi-Newton algorithm - adapted from unconstrained
nonlinear optimization - to select a search direction and step
length. When no further progress can be made with the current
collection of basic and superbasic variables, a new superbasic
variable is chosen from among the nonbasic ones; when a basic or
superbasic variables encounters a bound as a result of a step, it
is made nonbasic.

     To deal with nonlinear constraints, MINOS further general-
izes its algorithm by means of a projected Lagrangian approach.
At each major iteration, a linear approximation to the nonlinear
constraints is constructed around the current solution, and the
objective is modified by adding two terms - the Lagrangian and
the penalty term - which compensate (in a rough sense) for the
inaccuracy of the linear approximation.  The resulting subproblem
is then solved by a series of minor iterations of the reduced
gradient algorithm described in the previous paragraph.  The
optimum of this subproblem becomes the current solution for the
next major iteration.

     AMPL sends MINOS the information it needs to compute the
values and partial derivatives of all nonlinear terms in the
objective and constraints.  The method of ``automatic differenti-
ation'' is employed to compute the derivatives efficiently and
exactly (subject to the limitations of computer arithmetic).

     MINOS stores the linear and nonlinear parts of a mathemati-
cal program separately.  The representation of the linear part is
essentially the same as for a linear program, while the represen-
tation of the nonlinear part requires an amount of RAM memory
depending on the complexity of the nonlinear terms.  A factoriza-
tion of the basis matrix is maintained as for linear programs,
and has the same memory requirements.  The quasi-Newton algorithm
also maintains a factorization of a dense matrix that occupies
memory proportional to the square of the number of superbasic
variables.  This number is small is many applications, but it is
highly problem-dependent; in general terms, a problem that is
``more nonlinear'' will tend to have more superbasics.

     The following MINOS directives are useful in solving nonlin-
ear mathematical programs.  Since the reduced gradient method
incorporates many of the ideas from the simplex method, many of
the directives for linear programming carry over in a natural
way; others address the complications introduced by a nonlinear
objective and constraints.

Completion=partial                 (default)

     When there are nonlinear constraints, this directive deter-
mines whether subproblems should be solved to moderate accuracy
(partial completion), or to full accuracy (full completion).
Partial completion may reduce the work during early major itera-
tions; an automatic switch to full completion occurs when several
numerical tests indicate that the sequence of major iterations is
converging.  Full completion from the outset may lead to fewer
major iterations, but may result in more minor iterations.

Crash_option=i                     (default 3)
Crash_tolerance=r                  (default 0.1)

     Crash_option values 0 and 1, and the crash_tolerance, work
the same as for linear programs.  A crash_option of 2 first finds
a basis for the linear constraints; after the first major itera-
tion has found a solution that satisfies the linear constraints,
the crash heuristic is called again to extend the basis to the
nonlinear constraints.  A value of 3 is similar except that lin-
ear equalities and linear inequalities are processed by separate
passes of the crash routine, in the same way as for linear pro-

Expand_frequency=i                 (default 10000)

     This directive works the same as for linear programming, but
takes effect only when there is currently just one superbasic

Factorization_frequency=i          (default 100)

     The basis is refactorized every i minor iterations, as in
linear programming.  If there are nonlinear constraints, the com-
putation of a new linear approximation necessitates a refactor-
ization at the start of each major iteration; thus the
minor_iterations directive normally takes precedence over this

Feasibility_tolerance=r            (default 1.0e-6)

     Essentially the same as for linear programming.

     MINOS allows nonlinear functions to be evaluated at points
that satisfy the linear constraints and bounds to within the tol-
erance r.  Thus every attempt should be made to bound the vari-
ables strictly away from regions where nonlinear functions are
undefined.  As an example, if the function sqrt(X) appears, it is
essential to enforce a positive lower bound on X; for r at its
default value of 1.0e-6, the constraint X>=1.0e-5 might be appro-
priate.  (Note that X>=0 does not suffice.)

     When there are nonlinear constraints, this tolerance applies
to each linear approximation.  Feasibility with respect to the
nonlinear constraints themselves is governed by the setting of
the row_tolerance directive.

Hessian_dimension=r                (default 50 or superbasics_limit)

     Memory proportional to r2 is set aside for the factorization
of the dense matrix required by the quasi-Newton method, limiting
the size of the matrix to rxr.  To promote rapid convergence as
the optimum is approached, r should be greater than the expected
number of superbasic variables whenever available memory permits.
It need never be larger than 1 + the number of variables appear-
ing in nonlinear terms, and for many problems it can be much

Iterations_limit=i                 (default 99999999)

     MINOS stops after a total of i minor iterations, even if an
optimum has not been indicated.

Lagrangian=yes                     (default)

     This directive determines the form of the objective function
used for the linearized subproblems. The default value yes is
highly recommended. The penalty_parameter directive is then also

     If no is specified, the nonlinear constraint functions will
be evaluated only twice per major iteration.  Hence this option
may be useful if the nonlinear constraints are very expensive to
evaluate.  However, in general there is a great risk that conver-
gence may not be achieved.

Linesearch_tolerance=r             (default 0.1)

     After the quasi-Newton method has determined a search direc-
tion at a minor iteration, r controls the accuracy with which the
objective function is minimized in that direction.   The default
value r=0.1 requests a moderately accurate search, which should
be satisfactory in most cases.

     If the nonlinear functions are cheap to evaluate, a more
accurate search may be appropriate; try r=0.01 or r=0.001.  The
number of iterations should decrease, and this will reduce total
run time if there are many constraints.

     If the nonlinear functions are expensive to evaluate, a less
accurate search may be appropriate; try r=0.5 or perhaps r=0.9.
The number of iterations will probably increase, but the total
number of function evaluations may decrease enough to compensate.

LU_factor_tolerance=r1             (default 100.0)
LU_update_tolerance=r2             (default 10.0)

     Same as for linear programming.

LU_singularity_tolerance=r1        (default eps2/3~~10E-11)
LU_swap_tolerance=r2               (default eps1/4~~10E-4)

     When the problem is nonlinear, these directives influence
tests for singularity after refactorization of the basis matrix.
The LU_singularity_tolerance works the same as for linear pro-
gramming.  The LU_swap_tolerance is employed by a test to deter-
mine when a basic variable should be swapped with a superbasic
variable to discourage singularity.  A smaller value of r2 tends
to discourage this swapping.

Major_damping_parameter=r          (default 2.0)

     This directive may assist convergence on problems that have
highly nonlinear constraints.  It is intended to prevent large
relative changes between solutions (both the primal variables and
the dual multipliers in the Lagrangian term) at successive sub-
problems; for example, the default value 2.0 prevents the rela-
tive change from exceeding 200 percent.  This is accomplished by
picking the actual new solution to lie somewhere on the line con-
necting the previous solution to the proposed new solution deter-
mined by the algorithm.

     This is a very crude control.  If the sequence of major
iterations does not appear to be converging, first re-run the
problem with a higher penalty_parameter (say 2, 4 or 10).  If the
subproblem solutions continue to change violently, try reducing r
to a value such as 0.2 or 0.1.

Major_iterations=i                 (default 50)

     MINOS stops after i major iterations, even if an optimum has
not been indicated.

Minor_damping_parameter=r          (default=2.0)

     This directive limits the change in the variables during the
determination of the step length in a minor iteration.  The
default value should not affect progress on well behaved prob-
lems, but setting r=0.1 or 0.01 may be helpful when rapidly vary-
ing functions are present.  (In the case of functions that
increase or decrease rapidly to infinite values, upper and lower
bounds should also be supplied wherever possible to avoid evalua-
tion of the function at points where overflow will occur.)

     In cases where several local optima exist, specifying a
small value for r may help locate an optimum near the starting

Minor_iterations=i                 (default 40)

     At a major iteration, MINOS allows any number of minor iter-
ations for the purpose of finding a point that is feasible in the
linearized constraints.  Once such a feasible point has been
found, at most i additional minor iterations are carried out.  A
moderate value (say, 301 if
the number of superbasic variables at the starting point is much
less than the number expected at the optimum.

     For linear programs, i>1 will cause the reduced-gradient
algorithm to be applied in place of the simplex algorithm, but
generally with inferior results.  This differs from the ``multi-
ple pricing'' designed to accelerate the choice of an entering
variable in other large-scale simplex implementations.

Optimality_tolerance=r             (default 1.0e-6)

     Same as for linear programming.

Partial_price=i                    (default 1)

     Same as for linear programming, except for the default

Penalty_parameter=r                (default 1.0)

     When there are nonlinear constraints, r determines the mag-
nitude of the penalty term that is appended to the objective.
For early runs on a problem with unknown characteristics, the
default value should be acceptable.  If the problem is highly
nonlinear and the major iterations do not converge, a larger
value such as 2 or 5 may help; but if r is too large, the rate of
convergence may be unnecessarily slow.  On the other hand, if the
functions are nearly linear or a good starting point is known, it
will often be safe to specify r=0.0, although in general a posi-
tive r is necessary to ensure convergence.

Pivot_tolerance=r                  (default eps2/3~~10E-11)

     Same as for linear programming.

Radius_of_convergence=r            (default 0.01)

     When there are nonlinear constraints, MINOS employs a
heuristic test to determine when the solution may have entered a
region of fast convergence near the optimum.  At this stage the
penalty parameter is reduced and full completion is chosen (see
directives completion and penalty_parameter).  A smaller value of
r delays entry into this stage.

Row_tolerance=r                    (default 1.0e-6)

     This directive specifies how accurately the nonlinear con-
straints should be satisfied at an optimal solution, relative to
the magnitudes of the variables.  A larger value may be appropri-
ate if the problem functions involve data known to be of low


Scale_option=i                     (default 1)
Scale_tolerance=r                  (default 0.9)

     Mostly the same as for linear programming.  The default of
i=1 causes only the linear variables and constraints to be
scaled, and should generally be tried first.  When i=2 all vari-
ables are scaled; the result depends on the initial linear
approximation, and should therefore be used only if a good start-
ing point is provided, and the problem is not highly nonlinear.

Subspace_tolerance=r               (default 0.5)

     This directive controls the extent to which optimization is
confined to the current subset of basic and superbasic variables,
before one or more nonbasic variables are added to the superbasic
set.  A smaller value of r tends to prolong optimization over the
current subset, possibly increasing the number of iterations but
reducing the number of basis changes.

     A large value such as r=0.9 may sometimes lead to improved
overall efficiency, if the number of superbasic variables has to
increase substantially between the starting point and an optimal

Superbasics_limit=i                (default 50 or hessian_dimension)

     The number of superbasic variables is limited to i.  (See
also the comments on the hessian_dimension directive.)

Unbounded_objective_value=r1       (default 1.0e+20)
Unbounded_step_size=r2             (default 1.0e+10)

     A nonlinear program is reported as unbounded if, in the
quasi-Newton algorithm carrying out a minor iteration, the func-
tion value exceeds r1 in magnitude or the length of the step
exceeds r2.  Unboundedness may occur even though there exists a
finite local optimum of interest; it is best prevented by bound-
ing the variables to keep them within a meaningful region.

II.5  Output from MINOS

     When invoked by solve, MINOS normally returns just a few
lines to your screen to summarize its performance.  The direc-
tives described below let you choose more output, either to the
screen or to a file.  This may be useful for monitoring the pro-
gress of a long run, or for comparing in detail the effects of
selected algorithmic directives.

     Because MINOS is a Fortran program that adheres to certain
Fortran conventions, the treatment of file specifications is
somewhat different from that of most MS-DOS or UNIX programs.  As
indicated below, MINOS directives refer to files by file unit
numbers, and an additional directive is needed to associate a
file number with a file name of your choosing.

Summary_file=f                     (default 0)
Summary_level=i1                   (default 0)
Summary_frequency=i2               (default 100)

     These directives control a summary listing of MINOS's pro-
gress.  The default setting f=0 suppresses the listing; any value
f = 1, 2, 3, 4 or 6 through 99 causes the listing to be written
to a file named fort.f in the current directory, or to the named
file if the directive f=filename is present.  Thus to send the
summary listing to fort.9 in the current directory, you would say

     ampl: option minos_options 'summary_file=9';

or to send the listing to steel3.sum, you could use

     ampl: option minos_options 'summary_file=9 9=steel3.sum';

A value of f=5 is not allowed.  A value of f=6 causes the listing
to be written to the ``standard output'', which in interactive
operation is your screen unless you have redirected it with a
command of the form solve >filename.  For mathematical programs
that take a long time to solve, summary_file=6 is recommended to
help you track the algorithm's progress.

     For linear programs, MINOS writes a ``log line'' to the sum-
mary listing every i2 iterations, as well as some statistics on
the entire run at the end.  For example:

 ampl: model steelT3.mod; data steelT3.dat;
 ampl: option minos_options 'summary_file=6 summary_frequency=5';
 ampl: solve;

 MINOS 5.4:
     Itn       dj  ninf      sinf       objective
       1 -9.5E-01     1 3.429E+00 -9.99999859E+01
  Itn  2 -- feasible solution.  Objective =   2.499999647E+02
       5 -5.1E+01     0 0.000E+00  1.14300000E+05
      10 -4.9E+01     0 0.000E+00  3.04350000E+05
      15 -4.0E+01     0 0.000E+00  4.05892857E+05
      20  1.4E+01     0 0.000E+00  5.11953143E+05
      25 -5.5E-01     0 0.000E+00  5.14521714E+05

  EXIT -- optimal solution found

  No. of iterations               25     Objective value   5.1452171425E+05
  No. of degenerate steps          1     Percentage                    4.00
  Norm of x                5.153E+03     Norm of pi               2.391E+02
  Norm of x  (unscaled)    8.159E+04     Norm of pi (unscaled)    3.375E+03

The items in the log line are the iteration number, the reduced
cost of the variable chosen to enter the basis, the number and
sum of infeasibilities in the current solution, and the value of
the objective.

     When there are nonlinearities in the objective but linear
constraints, the reduced cost in the log lines is replaced by the
more general reduced gradient, and two items are added at the
end:  the cumulative number of evaluations of the objective func-
tion, and the number of superbasic variables.

     If there are nonlinearities in the constraints, MINOS writes
a log line at each major iteration, and if i1 > 0 also a log line
after every i2 minor iterations.

Print_file=f                       (default 0)
Print_level=i1                     (default 0)
Print_frequency=i2                 (default 100)

     These directives are essentially the same as the preceding
ones, except that they produce more extensive listings.  Details
are provided in the MINOS User's Guide.

timing=i                           (default 0)

     When this directive is changed to 1 from its default value
of 0, a summary of processing times is displayed:

	MINOS times:
	read:       0.15
	solve:      2.77       excluding minos setup: 2.42
	write:      0.00
	total:      2.92

Read is the time that MINOS takes to read the problem from a file
that has been written by AMPL.  Solve is the time that MINOS spends
setting up and solving the problem; the time for solving alone is
also given.  Write is the time that MINOS takes to write the solu-
tion to a file for AMPL to read.

II.6  Restarting from an initial guess

     MINOS can often make good use of an initial guess at a solu-
tion to a mathematical program.  The optimal solution to one lin-
ear program may provide a particularly good guess for a similar
one to be solved next.  For nonlinear programs, a good initial
guess may be crucial to the success of the algorithm, and differ-
ent guesses may lead to different locally optimal solutions being

     There are two aspects to the initial guess for MINOS:  the
initial basis, and the initial solution.

The initial basis

     Several directives tell MINOS where to read or write a
record of the currently basic and superbasic variables, and of
the bounds at which the nonbasic variables are fixed.  These
directives make use of Fortran unit numbers like those described
for the summary and print files above.

New_basis_file=f1                  (default 0)
Backup_basis_file=f2               (default 0)
Save_frequency=i                   (default 100)


     For f1 = 1, 2, 3, 4 or 7 through 99, a record of the basis
is written every i iterations and at the completion of the algo-
rithm, either to a file named fort.f1 in the current directory,
or to the named file if the directive f1=filename is present.  In
particular, upon successful completion the file contains a record
of the optimal basis.  (Values f1 = 5 and f1 = 6 should not be

     The value of f2, which should be different from f1, is
interpreted in the same way.  If both f1 and f2 are specified as
different from zero, then two records of the basis are written;
this is to protect against a crash or other failure that may cor-
rupt one of them.

Old_basis_file=f                   (default 0)

     If f has its default value of 0, MINOS determines an initial
basis by use of a heuristic algorithm (see the crash_option
directive in II.3 above).  Otherwise, an initial basis is read
from a file.  For f = 1, 2, 3, 4 or 7 through 99, a previously
written record of the basis is read from either the file named
fort.f in the current directory, or the named file if the direc-
tive f=filename is present.  The numbers of variables and con-
straints recorded in the file must match the numbers of variables
and constraints in AMPL's currently active problem.  (Values f1 =
5 and f1 = 6 should not be used.)

     This feature can be useful for quickly solving a series of
linear programs that differ only in the data.  Before the first
linear program is solved, new_basis_file is set to a positive
integer so that a record of the optimal basis will be saved:

     ampl: model steelT3.mod; data steelT3.dat;
     ampl: option minos_options 'new_basis_file=77';
     ampl: solve;
     MINOS 5.4:
     MINOS 5.4: optimal solution found.
     24 iterations, objective 514521.7143

Then a data value is changed, and old_basis_file is set to the
same integer so that the previously optimal basis is used as a

     ampl: let avail[1] := 32;
     ampl: option minos_options 'old_basis_file=77';
     ampl: solve;
     MINOS 5.4:
     MINOS 5.4: optimal solution found.
     1 iterations, objective 493648.7143

Only 1 iteration is necessary to step to an adjacent basis that
is optimal for the modified linear program.  This approach works
as long as the change to the data does not affect the numbers of
variables and constraints.  (These numbers can be reduced by sim-
plifications carried out in AMPL's presolve phase, even when it
would seem that a change in the data should have no effect.  If
you receive an unexpected MINOS message that ``input basis had
wrong dimensions,'' use the AMPL command option show_stats 1 to
see what presolve has done, or use option presolve 0 to turn pre-
solve off.)

     Another use for this feature is to restart MINOS, possibly
with some directives changed, after it has reached an iteration
limit short of optimality.  See the discussions of
iterations_limit, minor_iterations and major_iterations in previ-
ous sections.

The initial solution

     AMPL passes to MINOS an initial value for each variable.  As
explained in the AMPL book, an initial value may be specified as
part of a variable's declaration in the model (Section 8.1), or
as part of the model's data (Section 9.3); the let command can
also change the values of variables (Section 10.8).  If a vari-
able is not assigned an initial value in any of these ways, then
it has an initial value of zero.

     If a variable has an initial value that is outside its
bounds, MINOS moves the initial value to the nearest bound.  Then
MINOS fixes all initially nonbasic and superbasic variables at
their initial values, and solves for the basic variables.  As a
result, MINOS's initial values for the basic variables are gener-
ally different from the values supplied by AMPL.

     AMPL also passes to MINOS an initial dual value associated
with each constraint.  Initial dual values are specified much
like the initial (primal) values for variables, except that they
are given in a constraint's declaration or by use of a
constraint's name in a data statement or let command.  MINOS uses
the initial dual values for nonlinear constraints to initialize
the corresponding dual multipliers in the Lagrangian term of the
objective.  Other initial dual values are ignored.


     Much of this material is based on text by Philip E. Gill,
Walter Murray, Bruce A. Murtagh and Michael A. Saunders.

Comments or questions?
Write to or use our comment form.

Return to the AMPL meetings page.

Return to the AMPL home page.